Comments on: Quirky but (mostly) useful software development rules https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/ Website Performance and Availability Monitoring | Pingdom Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:39:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 By: robx2012 https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7627 Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:39:24 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7627 Law of Rx  Moving a working Database and code to a “e-” platform can actually lower productivity. Wait for the “f-” or “g-” to work out the kinks. (e.g   g-commerce to replace e-commerce)

]]>
By: Danzibar https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7626 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:31:20 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7626 Danzibar’s Rule:
If something can go wrong, it already HAS. Be prepared.

]]>
By: Pma94301 https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7625 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:14 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7625 The Sunnyvale Principle:
There’s never time to do it right, but always time to do it over.

]]>
By: Andrew https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7624 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:36:18 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7624 Hi you got me thinking about Moore’s law vs Writh’s law. If it was true then surely software would be so slow/complex that is wouldn’t run on todays computers! Anyway I looked as software complexity based on the growth of Lines of Code for a desktop operating system and plotted that against CPU power increase.
http://performancetestersdiary.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/wriths-verses-moores-law/

]]>
By: Andrew from Vancouver https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7623 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:28:31 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7623 The Dilbert Principle is a funny variation of the Peter Principle which is “In a Hierarchy Every Employee Tends to Rise to His Level of Incompetence.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle
… and I’ve found that Conway’s Law is better represented by contrasting that an ITIL-laden company you will find huge amount of comments and error checking and references to dates and supporting documents in the sourcecode, but in a more lithe company the same sourcecode will be a small shell script.

]]>
By: Kenneth Wildenhain https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7622 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:03:08 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7622 Kermit’s Law
To err is human, but to realy f*&# things up you need a computer.

]]>
By: Justin https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7621 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:24:39 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7621 Occam’s Razor also.

]]>
By: Mayson https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7620 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:24:53 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7620 Sturgeon’s Law usually applies.

]]>
By: Andy Baker https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7619 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:16:01 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7619 The Conway example doesn’t quite fit my understanding of the ‘law’.

]]>
By: drewmud https://www.pingdom.com/blog/quirky-but-mostly-useful-software-development-rules/#comment-7618 Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:38:13 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=3038#comment-7618 My favorite rule which I apply whenever my technology gets messed up by someone is Hanlon’s razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

]]>