Comments on: The best CDN for jQuery in 2012 https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/ Website Performance and Availability Monitoring | Pingdom Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:56:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 By: brunis1 https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3894 Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:56:23 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3894 You are talking about ping times and download times as if they were the same thing?!  how about downloading jquery once ever second for 30 days and then you can talk about reliability and uptime. This is useless.

How about a redo with more cdn’s in the mix? Cloudflare springs to mind, since they are hosting a lot more frameworks. Google’s might be the fastest for jquery, but who only uses jquery these days?

]]> By: isimmons33 https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3892 Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:37:18 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3892 So I’m thinking there are two main reasons google gets used more than media temple. 
1. How many people have even heard of media temple and if they have heard of them for web hosting who knew they were also providing a cdn?
2. If you’re using google for your https it makes sense to also use them for your http
I am wondering though, with the possibility of people clearing browser cache, is it better to go with a faster dl time or to hope they already have it cached from the more popular cdn?

]]> By: jolyon https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3890 Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:30:25 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3890 If you want your site to be usable in China and other places where Google occasionally gets blocked, it’s probably wise NOT to choose them as your CDN for jquery.
 
I don’t have any evidence that Google’s CDN gets blocked when Google/YouTube etc get blocked, but is it worth taking the risk?

]]> By: David Stinemetze https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3888 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 03:52:25 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3888 Ill give it a shot when I get the chance. Thanks

]]> By: Pingdom https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3886 Thu, 26 Jul 2012 06:01:02 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3886 David, you could always monitor them yourself with a Pingdom account and see what the results are.

]]> By: David Stinemetze https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3884 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:58 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3884 What if you have a host jQuery on a separate CDN network such as Amazon or Rackspace? Anybody know how they would compare?

]]> By: Ditch Suarez https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3882 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:33:51 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3882 hahaa, fakshet ang ms. saonz.

]]> By: Doc Emmett https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3880 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:10:53 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3880 Thanks, this is very useful.

]]> By: joshfraser https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3874 Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:50:55 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3874 The probability of a local browser hit matters far more to me than the difference of a few ms.  For that, Google wins hands down.

]]> By: Hanns Chong https://www.pingdom.com/blog/best-cdn-for-jquery-in-2012/#comment-3878 Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:28:17 +0000 http://royalpingdom.wpengine.com/?p=15829#comment-3878 awesome blog! thanks!

]]>